Credited creators
45
Built with listeners. Better with creators
Creators help keep the archive accurate, useful, and alive. Verify your show, correct metadata, submit new work, and add official context so listeners get a cleaner archive record.
Published show records
68
Records with sourced metadata
68
All published records currently have sourced metadata.
Full archive reviews
7
Last updated
July 10, 2026
What you can do
Submit a show
Add a new show to the archive. We review for sourcing, fit, and listener usefulness.
Suggest a correction
Spotted an error? Help us fix facts and metadata so listeners get the right record.
Request verification
Confirm official links and core facts so your show record carries a clear factual trust signal.
Creator standards
Read the standards behind verification, corrections, and the line we keep between sourced facts and editorial judgment.
How it works
You submit
Choose the right path and send the details that matter.
We review
We check sourcing, metadata, and archive fit by hand.
We verify or update
Approved factual updates go in, and verification notes are added when relevant.
It goes live
Changes appear in the archive with clearer context for listeners.
What creators can update
Official linksWebsite, RSS, socials
Release statusOngoing, on hiatus, ended
Cover artArtwork, logos, banners
Tags & categoriesGenres, themes, tones
Creator or network nameCorrect name and aliases
LanguagePrimary spoken language
Show descriptionBetter details for listeners
CreditsHosts, producers, writers, guests
What stays independent
Archive ratingsEditorial ratings stay ours.
Editorial takesWritten summaries and critiques stay ours.
Listener reviewsCommunity reviews stay with listeners.
Spotlights & featuresWhen they launch, they stay editorial.
Creator spotlight
An intentional format preview. Real creator spotlights will appear here once the archive publishes its first sourced features.
Spotlight preview
Signal Window
Format preview
How a creator spotlight will appear
This sample is here on purpose. It previews the tone, layout, and sourced context reserved for future creator spotlights.
- 8.4/10
- Sample archive rating
- 4.8K
- Sample response count
- 2026
- Sample launch year
Editorial standards
These are the rules behind verification, corrections, and archive trust.
Accuracy first
Facts, links, and release details must trace back to credible sources.
Transparency
Verification and corrections cover facts, not hidden influence over archive opinions.
Respect and inclusion
Submissions should improve the archive without harassment, misinformation, or abuse.
Clear listener expectations
Descriptions, tags, and format notes should clarify the listening experience.
Rights and originality
Records should respect copyright, attribution, and the line between official and editorial material.
Ongoing upkeep
Metadata can be refreshed, but review still applies and paid paths never override standards.
FAQ for creators
Quick answers on review timing, verification, updates, and the line between factual fixes and editorial independence.
There is no public turnaround promise yet. Every submission is reviewed by hand, and nothing auto-publishes. If you are fixing a time-sensitive factual error, use the correction path and include sources so it is easier to review quickly.
No. Verification is a factual trust signal, not a requirement for inclusion. Shows can appear in the archive without creator verification as long as the archive has enough reliable public information to list them responsibly.
Yes. Use the correction path for factual changes like links, credits, and metadata. Use creator verification when you want the archive to review official sourcing for a show record. Both paths still go through moderation.
Listener reviews are submitted through the moderated submit flow. They can contribute to community context, but they do not replace Archive Ratings. Creator verification also does not change or approve listener reviews.
Factual corrections are always welcome, but ratings, archive notes, collections, and future spotlights remain editorial decisions. Creator verification improves factual metadata only and never implies approval of archive opinions.
Your story. Our standards. Stronger together.
Independent audio deserves clean records, honest context, and better discovery.