Archive /Sci Fi /The Program audio series
Indexed OnlySci Fi

The Program audio series

A colder sci-fi anthology for listeners who want systems, doctrine, and unease.

Key tags
Sci FiAnthologyDystopian
Archive rating 0/10 Echo score
Community rating --/10 No ratings yet
Runtime44 current feed entries in the anthology feed.
FormatAnthology
CompletionOngoing
Release statusActive

The Program audio series cover art
Best for
Serious Sci Fi
Headphones On
Late Night

Official summary

The listener-facing setup and premise for the show, kept separate from the archive take.

A speculative anthology set inside a future social order where money, state, and god have fused into one governing force.

Archive note

Indexed and recommendation-ready, with the longer archive review still unpublished.

Why it is here

Works best when the listener wants serious sci-fi ideas delivered with more chill than spectacle.

Listener reviews

Community reviews stay separate from archive ratings and creator verification.

No listener reviews are published for this show yet. The archive rating above is editorial; this section stays reserved for moderated listener response.

Start next

Closest neighboring picks in the archive once you finish this one.

Derelict cover art

Derelict

One of the archive's cleaner high-pressure sci-fi recommendations when atmosphere and propulsion both need to show up.

Open show
Ars Paradoxica cover art

Ars Paradoxica

Best when you want a plot that respects the listener and keeps paying off its own weird science.

Open show
Case 63 cover art

Case 63

A clean recommendation when the listener wants time-travel tension without a giant onboarding burden.

Open show

Discovery routes

Curated listening paths already connected to this show in the archive.

Community archive care

Help keep this entry accurate.

Spot a metadata issue, missing link, or verification problem? Listener and creator notes go into the manual review queue before anything changes.

Found something off?

Send the archive team the exact issue and any source links that make it easier to verify.

Suggest a correction